RESTRUCTURING

Corporate Rescue in Malaysia: Judicial Management and Schemes of Arrangement

Legal Insight · TEO JENG YU & PARTNERS

When a company faces financial distress, the instinctive question is often whether it can be saved at all. Malaysian law provides several corporate rescue mechanisms specifically designed to give a distressed company breathing room to attempt exactly that, rather than moving straight to liquidation.

Judicial Management

Judicial management places a company's affairs, business and property under the control of a court-appointed judicial manager, with the objective of achieving a better outcome for creditors than an immediate winding-up would.

Once an application for judicial management is made, or an order is granted, a moratorium generally takes effect, restraining most legal proceedings, execution and enforcement action against the company without leave of the court — giving management and the judicial manager time to negotiate with creditors without the immediate threat of asset seizure.

Judicial management is not available to every company; certain regulated entities and companies already subject to specific insolvency proceedings are excluded, and the applicant generally needs to show the company is, or is likely to become, unable to pay its debts, and that judicial management is likely to achieve a better outcome than liquidation.

Schemes of Arrangement

A scheme of arrangement allows a company to put a restructuring proposal — which may involve compromising debts, extending repayment terms, or converting debt to equity — to its creditors or shareholders for approval, and, once approved by the requisite majority and sanctioned by the court, the scheme binds all affected creditors, including those who voted against it.

A scheme is often combined with a restraining order, which operates similarly to the moratorium under judicial management, preventing creditors from taking enforcement action while the scheme is being negotiated and put to a vote.

Because a scheme binds dissenting creditors, the process for obtaining approval — creditor classification, disclosure, and the fairness of the proposal — is closely scrutinised by the court, and a poorly prepared scheme risks being rejected at the sanction stage even after creditor approval is obtained.

What This Means for Creditors

For financial institutions and other creditors, the key questions when a debtor enters, or proposes, one of these processes are usually the strength of existing security (since secured creditors are often treated differently under a scheme or moratorium), the credibility of the restructuring proposal, and how the proposal compares to the likely recovery in a straightforward liquidation.

Creditors should also consider whether to take an active role in the process — including participating in creditor committees or challenging aspects of the proposal — rather than treating it as something that happens to them.

Timing Is Everything

For directors, the options available narrow considerably the longer a company continues trading while genuinely insolvent, both because the practical rescue options diminish and because of the personal exposure directors can face for wrongful or insolvent trading. Acting early, while the widest range of options is still realistically available, is consistently the single most important factor in a successful rescue.

Our practice advises companies, directors, creditors and financial institutions on restructuring options, judicial management, schemes of arrangement and the practical consequences of each for the stakeholders involved.

Whether you are a company assessing rescue options or a creditor deciding how to respond to one, an early and realistic assessment of the position is usually the most valuable step available.

This article provides general information about Malaysian law as a matter of public interest. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied on as a substitute for advice from qualified counsel on the specific facts of a matter. Laws and their interpretation change, and this article may not reflect the most current position.

← Back to Legal Insights